Evidence-based decision making in occupational health.
نویسنده
چکیده
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is founded on the appealing paradigm of promoting the identification, appraisal and application of the best practices in health care, supporting doctors in the decision making process. The continuous development of health care presents a solid ground for more effective practices; however, research findings in the health services suggest that there is a gap between evidence and practice [1]. EBM has raised awareness among practitioners and decision makers, but the approach is not followed in everyday practice for several reasons. These include the complex literature organization, its irrelevance to clinical practice, the difficulty in applying its results to the individual patient and the barrier to change. As a consequence, ineffective practices are performed for several reasons, including over-reliance on a surrogate outcome, the love of a wrong pathophysiological model and the need to do something [2]. So far, health service research in occupational health has not provided relevant information about the appro-priateness of usual practices. However, there is a growing awareness and pressure that a decision in occupational health practice should be supported by the best available evidence in order to maximize the outcome. In the past few years, Occupational Medicine has hosted papers and editorials dealing with this intriguing topic [3 – 5] supporting the need to transfer scientific evidence into daily practice. However, as for general practitioners, several obstacles exist when approaching problems according to the EBM principles: lacking skill in formulating answerable questions, insufficient time required to find information and scarce capacity of integrating evidence to make decisions. Like health care professionals, occupational health professionals must rely on the best available evidence supporting the appropriateness of diagnostic tests and preventive or clinical interventions. Therefore, like in health care, scientific literature is a crucial element of the evidence-based decision making process. The appropri-ateness of the practice is one of the key elements of any intervention, as was stated 20 years ago by the International Labour Office [6], who suggested that quality-oriented services founded on sound evidence-based practice should be supplied. The principles of EBM can be adapted in occupational health practice, whose evidence-based decision process can be defined as the current best evidence in making decisions [7]. The decision process consists of an approach requiring the conscientious (to apply the best evidence when possible), judicious (to use recommendation for patients/workers/community), explicit (to transparently demonstrate the reliability of each decision) integration of relevant scientific evidence relating …
منابع مشابه
System Factors Influencing the Australian Nurses' Evidence-based Clinical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Recent Studies
Background: There is growing attention to evidence-based practice in Australian clinical contexts and nursing literature. Recent research explores the dimensions of evidence-based practice; however, the implementation of evidence-based clinical decision making has been identified as a cumbersome process. Aim: This study aimed to review the literature syst...
متن کاملBridging the gap between the economic evaluation literature and daily practice in occupational health: a qualitative study among decision-makers in the healthcare sector
BACKGROUND Continued improvements in occupational health can only be ensured if decisions regarding the implementation and continuation of occupational health and safety interventions (OHS interventions) are based on the best available evidence. To ensure that this is the case, scientific evidence should meet the needs of decision-makers. As a first step in bridging the gap between the economic...
متن کاملDecisions of Value: Going Backstage; Comment on “Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis”
This commentary expands on two of the key themes briefly raised in the paper involving analysis of the evidence about key contextual influences on decisions of value. The first theme focuses on the need to explore in more detail what is called backstage decision-making looking at how actual decisions are made drawing on evidence from ethnographies about decision-making. These studies point to l...
متن کاملSmog, Cognition and Real-World Decision-Making
Cognitive functioning is critical as in our daily life a host of real-world complex decisions in high-stakes markets have to be made. The decision-making process can be vulnerable to environmental stressors. Summarizing the growing economic and epidemiologic evidence linking air pollution, cognition performance and real-world decision-making, we first illustrate key physiological and psychologi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Occupational medicine
دوره 55 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005